Berkeley Approved 20-Story Apartment Tower at 2425 Durant Avenue

2425 Durant Avenue establishing view, rendering by Yes Community Architects2425 Durant Avenue establishing view, rendering by Yes Community Architects

Berkeley’s Zoning Adjustments Board has approved plans for a 20-story apartment tower at 2425 Durant Avenue in the Southside neighborhood. The development is poised to create 169 student-oriented units close to the UC Berkeley campus. Collabhome is the project developer.

2425 Durant Avenue view from across Telegraph Avenue, rendering by Yes Community Architects

2425 Durant Avenue view from across Telegraph Avenue, rendering by Yes Community Architects

2425 Durant Avenue sidewalk view, rendering by Yes Community Architects

2425 Durant Avenue sidewalk view, rendering by Yes Community Architects

Yes Community Architects is responsible for drafting the project. In a public statement published by the firm’s principal, Yes Duffy describes that the plan “organizes the tower into a series of ‘neighborhoods’—smaller social networks with community kitchens, study areas, and lounges—to support connection, wellness, and belonging in dense urban living. You can even see the community areas in the form and facade of the building.”

The development is expected to rise 208 feet tall to yield 148,940 square feet, including 130,970 square feet of housing and around 1,010 square feet of open space. Once complete, the structure will contain 169 units, with 105 studios, a one-bedroom unit, 46 two-bedroom apartments, and 17 three-bedroom apartments.

2425 Durant Avenue entry view, rendering by Yes Community Architects

2425 Durant Avenue entry view, rendering by Yes Community Architects

2425 Durant Avenue, rendering by Yes Community Architects

2425 Durant Avenue, rendering by Yes Community Architects

Earlier this year, Berkeley City Council rejected an attempt to landmark the existing three structures on the site with 19 rent-controlled units, including an 1886-built Stick-style Victorian home, 1905-built flats, and a 1906 cottage that was expanded into a duplex in 1925.

2425 Durant Avenue elevation, illustration by Yes Community Architects

2425 Durant Avenue elevation, illustration by Yes Community Architects

The application is now looking to feature 32 affordable homes, including six extremely low-income, seven very low-income, six low-income, and 13 moderate-income units. This consists of 19 units of replacement affordable housing25 for the existing residents.

2425 Durant Avenue, image via Google Street View

2425 Durant Avenue, image via Google Street View

The 0.22-acre parcel is located between Dana Street and the busy Telegraph Avenue. The UC Berkeley campus’s primary southern entrance is just a block away, once on Telegraph Avenue. Rhoades Planning Group is the development consultant.

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

6 Comments on "Berkeley Approved 20-Story Apartment Tower at 2425 Durant Avenue"

  1. Every 1-2 story structure in South Berkeley has a target on its back, and for good reason. Berkeley has seen the light…that it needs to build housing desperately, especially for students. Downtown Berkeley is going to feel like a very different place in 20 years. I wonder whether it will start to eat into Oakland’s demand / take residents from downtown Oakland.

    • Downtown Oakland has its own ecosystem of employment, amenities, cultural communities and proximity to jobs in SF. I don’t see this changing with more housing in downtown Berkeley. Every city needs to build like 5x what we have been averaging to push the needle from a demand perspective.

      • I’m mostly referring to avoiding crime. Downtown Oakland, and many areas nearby, still struggle with it. I have heard of multiple people leaving downtown or Lakeshore areas for places like Rockridge. Downtown Berkeley still provides access to SF, urban amenities and cultural communities, but without the drive-by shootings.

    • Scotty McWiener | October 27, 2025 at 9:16 am | Reply

      While I think it’s true that Berkeley definitely needs more housing, and there are plenty of non-descript one or two-story buildings that should be replaced, this should be done in a thoughtful way. Instead, we have handed the reigns to Big Development. As a societ we are eventually going to regret destroying California’s robust environmental protection laws. It’s going to be like the 1960s all over again and within a decade downtown Berkeley will have all of the charm of Milpitas. And don’t get me started on all the greenfield sprawl that these new laws have incentivized. Well done all you East Coast YIMBYs!!!!

      • This is such a strange projection of your biases, I can’t tell if its genuine or sarcasm.

        Nobody is building at a rate that would replace all the SFH’s in Berkeley, nor will the economics make that pan out fo a long time. If property owners decide to sell, or develop, however, that their right in a society with private property enshrined in our legal system. Yuo don’t get to bully them from selling or developing their property with illusions about neighborhood character or noise conerns that you manipulate CEQA for.

        “Big Development” – many of the developers in Berkeley arenot “big,” and are local companies using local subs with local employees and local architects, engineers and consultants.

        Robust environmental laws – CEQA was abolished for urban infill residential development under 80 feet high. Upzoning is primarly happening near dense transit corridors. No environments are threatened by this, we we get to offset urban sprawl into greenfields by allowing more urban development instead.

  2. FINALLY! one of these recently approved Berkeley towers with a decent design!

    While not located right on the main arteries of Shattuck or University Ave, this project answers earlier criticisms about the sad lack of design quality and diversity in almost every one of the towers proposed for downtown Berkeley in recent years. If it is built with the reality approaching the quality in the renderings, just proves the point that good design is not entirely dependent on budget and the market, rather it is primarily the result of good designers being involved!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*