Architectural Review For 4335-4345 El Camino Real, Palo Alto

4335-4345 El Camino Real Elevation 24335-4345 El Camino Real Elevation 2 via SDG Architects

A new residential project has been proposed for development at 4335-4345 El Camino Real in Palo Alto. The project proposal includes the construction of a new residential community offering townhomes within 29 new three-story buildings. The project will replace existing buildings offering commercial and motel uses.

Summer Hill Homes LLC is the project developer. SDG Architects Inc is responsible for the designs. R3 Studios is responsible for the landscape architecture.

4335-4345 El Camino Real Site Plan

4335-4345 El Camino Real Site Plan via SDG Architects

4335-4345 El Camino Real Elevation

4335-4345 El Camino Real Elevation via SDG Architects

The scope of work includes the construction of a new townhome condominium community and associated site improvements on two parcels. Named Cesano Court Townhomes, the project will also offer four units at Below Market Rate.

4335-4345 El Camino Real Townhomes 1

4335-4345 El Camino Real Townhomes 1 via SDG Architects

4335-4345 El Camino Real Townhomes 2

4335-4345 El Camino Real Townhomes 2 via SDG Architects

4335-4345 El Camino Real Townhomes 3

4335-4345 El Camino Real Townhomes 3 via SDG Architects

A compliant Senate Bill 330 pre-application was submitted in January, 2024. An architectural review meeting has been scheduled on Thursday, September 19, 2024. Details of joining the meeting can be found here.

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

5 Comments on "Architectural Review For 4335-4345 El Camino Real, Palo Alto"

  1. Let me put forth the standard NIMBY objections :

    i) Since this is not enough supply to immediately lower prices by enough, it should not be built at all.
    ii) Since it cannot be completed immediately and will take years, it should not be built at all.

    How did I do?

  2. What this community needs is more affordable housing for people of color, transgender and newly arrived immigrants. I’m sure progressive professor’s at Stanford University would agree!

  3. From a land use perspective – this is fine – there is some lite density and a good amount of trees and landscaping, an improvement. Fine. From an architectural perspective, these things are a bummer. Who likes this material pallete, why does it keep getting built?

  4. JohnMichael O'Connor | September 17, 2024 at 2:15 pm | Reply

    This relatively new practice of making it one criterion of a land use decision that some POC be inserted into every community with which they have nothing in common is becoming more prominent by the day in the SF Bay Area. Plus, in making the housing ‘affordable’, you get ugly buildings like these in order to make it pencil out.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*