Updated illustrations have been published for the eight-story Flatiron-style apartment complex at 3230 24th Street in San Francisco’s Mission District. The new design comes as the formal planning applications were submitted to the city. Wong Logan Architects is responsible for the application and design.
The roughly 84-foot-tall structure is expected to contain 33,800 square feet, including 29,350 square feet for housing and 1,090 square feet for ground-floor commercial retail space. Parking for 12 bicycles will be included. Unit sizes will vary with 14 studios, 14 one-bedrooms, and seven three-bedroom residences.
3230 24th Street, rendering by Wong Logan Architects
Of the 35 units, three will be deed-restricted as affordable for two very-low-income households and one moderate-income household. The application utilizes the State Density Bonus law and Senate Bill 423 to increase residential capacity and streamline the approval process. The application makes use of a 75% density bonus above base zoning, which would allow for just 20 units.
Berkeley-based Wong Logan Architects is responsible for the design. Illustrations show the updated design emphasizes the horizontal bands and the Flatiron’s rounded corners. Facade materials are not listed.
3230 24th Street, image via Google Street View
The 0.1-acre property is a triangular parcel, shaped by a former Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, at the corner of 24th Street and Capp Street. Future residents would be a block away from the 24th Street Mission BART Station and a Grocery Store along South Van Ness Avenue.
The estimated cost and timeline for construction have not yet been established.
Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail
Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews
I’m surprised more faux-brick is not used in SF, especially in the mission where they are trying to make things look more humble. Everyone likes the look of brick.
It’s so disheartening to see designs consistently get worse with each iteration. No doubt financing an blah blah blah, are to blame for all of the value engineering. The color palette and horizontality of the windows are really unfortunate.
This rendering and updated design makes the building look dated already. I definitely like the previous scheme better
Y’all are crazy, this building looks nice.