CEQA Exemption Granted For 490 East Middlefield Road, Mountain View

490 East Middlefield Road evening view, rendering by SDT Architects490 East Middlefield Road evening view, rendering by SDT Architects

The City of Mountain View has granted a CEQA Exemption for the eight-story proposal at 490 East Middlefield Road in Mountain View, Santa Clara County. The project was determined to meet the criteria for the streamlined review through the California Environmental Quality Act via Assembly Bill 130. Jeff Stone of Diamond Construction Inc is listed as the project applicant, filed through WTA Middlefield LLC.

490 East Middlefield Road street view, rendering by SDT Architects

490 East Middlefield Road street view, rendering by SDT Architects

490 East Middlefield Road second-level floor plan, illustration by SDT Architects

490 East Middlefield Road second-level floor plan, illustration by SDT Architects

The roughly 85-foot-tall structure is expected to yield around 391,700 square feet, including 327,440 square feet for housing, 9,370 square feet of ground-level retail, and 54,960 square feet for the ground-level stacker-filled garage. Parking will be included for 495 cars and 358 bicycles. The project is expected to create 460 apartments, including 230 studios, 196 one-bedrooms, 26 two-bedrooms, and eight loft-style apartments.

SDT Architects is responsible for the design, working with Los Angeles-based Olin for the landscape architecture. Illustrations show the podium-style complex will be carved up to visually reduce the structure’s scale from the street. This includes facade articulation, setbacks, and wrapping the top two floors in a dark grey cladding. Facade materials will include insulated metal panels and stucco.

490 East Middlefield Road sidewalk view, rendering by SDT Architects

490 East Middlefield Road sidewalk view, rendering by SDT Architects

490 East Middlefield Road pedestrian view showcasing the podium-top courtyard, rendering by SDT Architects

490 East Middlefield Road pedestrian view showcasing the podium-top courtyard, rendering by SDT Architects

Residential amenities will be spread across several lounges, two podium-top courtyards, and a few fitness studios. The open-air courtyard will include a pool deck, a dog park, outdoor dining spaces, and ample seating.

The application benefits from Assembly Bill 130, which “expands CEQA to include a new statutory exemption applying to a broad array of infill housing projects.” The filing also invokes the State Density Bonus law to increase residential capacity above base zoning. Of the 460 units, 55 will be deed-restricted as affordable housing for low-income and very low-income households.

The 2.86-acre property is located along Middlefield Road between Ellis Street and North Whisman Road. Demolition will be required for an existing two-story office building. Future residents will find themselves between several Google-owned offices, apartments, and single-family homes. The site is close to the Middlefield lightrail station, less than 15 minutes from the Mountain View Caltrain Station via transit or bicycle.

490 East Middlefield Road vertical cross-section, illustration by SDT Architects

490 East Middlefield Road vertical cross-section, illustration by SDT Architects

490 East Middlefield Road, image via Google Satellite outlined approximately by YIMBY

490 East Middlefield Road, image via Google Satellite outlined approximately by YIMBY

The estimated cost and timeline for construction have not yet been established.

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

10 Comments on "CEQA Exemption Granted For 490 East Middlefield Road, Mountain View"

  1. oh woof! Almost 500 units… That’s how you combat a housing affordability crisis.

    What used to be a cruddy office building and a sea of parking will be homes for easily 500+ residents. Please, SJ, get started on just 5% of the tons of stuff approved city-wide.

  2. Scotty McWiener | March 13, 2026 at 9:15 am | Reply

    Interesting to watch the ongoing transformation of these office park wastelands into dense urban housing. It is going to be a strange hopscotch effect for a while until the transformation is complete.

    I am old enough to remember when a lot of these office parks were going up. As a kid I was so sad riding in my parents’ car and watching all of the almond, cherry, and plum orchards dozed and burned to build these beige office parks, as well as all of the beige slump block walls along the freeways announcing the arrival of yet another sprawly subdivision. I only saw the very tail end of it in the late 1970s/early 1980s, but the Santa Clara Valley was a stunningly beautiful place at one time. Think Napa with fruit trees instead of grapes.

    Maybe keep one or two of the “better” office parks as a reminder of what not to do.

    • Same thing happening out here in East Contra Costa County. Once full of beautiful farmland and vineyards…now they want to build office buildings,data centers and low income housing. Thankfully every time there is a local ballot measure to move the urban limit line, it gets voted down.I am in Discovery Bay with a two-lane road to Stockton that will never get any wider and they want to build a 3,000 home development on a once beautiful asparagus farm that is below the levee. Idiotic to say the least.

      • Scotty McWiener | March 13, 2026 at 11:11 am | Reply

        Yes, it’s a shame what they’re doing to east Contra Costa and San Joaquin counties. Seems like Stockton could do with some urban development in its downtown core rather than paving over all that rich farmland. The sprawl out there is unreal. It’s really depressing, but sadly most Americans want to live like that I guess.

      • Teri, you can’t live in Discovery Bay – low-density, SFH sprawl with man-made waterways built on “beautiful” agricultural land, 10-15 miles from any significant employment centers (even further away when it was first built) – and make a statement like this. Discovery Bay is part of the problem.

        • Sorry Daniel – this was initially built as a vacation area for golfers and boaters, not to live full time. It just ended up that way and there are now many off the water developments (The Lakes, Lakeshore, Seagrass, etc). We live right on the water and can boat from our house out to the fast water of the Delta. For us it is no problem, however they want to build a 3-story monstrosity in the middle of town that will be 100% affordable. You are right: we are 10-20 miles from any significant employment, 18 miles from E-BART that takes you to the Pittsburg BART station, no police presence (we have the Sheriff and CHP that patrol when they have time), a fire department outside of the main area that is manned by two people, no medical services, one VERY expensive Safeway and CVS, one gas station in town, no public transportation. And you know what, Daniel? We worked our asses off to live in this community. I am not of the belief that anyone can live anywhere they want to live just because. My family immigrated from Russia in the late 1800s – they all learned English, became wealthy farmers and did not live off the government. If they could do it, anyone can. Working hard has its rewards.

  3. Discovery Bay is a greenfield development built on what once was “beautiful farmland” that is barely above sea level (protected by levees) and now Teri is complaining about the same kind of development being proposed. Or not the same, this time it’s “low income housing.” Can’t let the riff-raff in and ruin your views I guess. Classic NIMBY. I’ve got mine now screw everyone else.

    • Renly: I grew up in fairly poor in El Cerrito which is right next to Richmond. Damn straight I don’t want to live near riff-raff. I was beat up every day in High School because of the riff-raff that got bussed in from Richmond. Like my black neighbor once said: I grew up in the ghetto, I don’t want to live in the ghetto now and that is why I moved to Discovery Bay.

      • You don’t even see the irony in what you are saying. But go ahead, enjoy your waterfront home you worked hard for it, who cares what happens to everyone else.

Leave a Reply to Renly Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*