Builder’s Remedy permits have been filed for a large suburban development at 1125 Fitzgerald Avenue in San Martin, Santa Clara County. The application aims to create over six hundred homes on farmland on the outskirts of Gilroy. Lucky Day Ranch is listed as the current property owner.
The developer has filed to produce 638 single-family homes across three separate applications. Prices will range from 554 units of market-rate homes to 84 units of deed-restricted lower-income homes.
Lucky Day Ranch is listed as the property owner, and it is represented by the Santa Clara-based Gillmor & Associates. The sprawling property is spread across several parcels extending around Fitzgerald Street, Turlock Avenue, and Santa Teresa Boulevard.
Future residents will be around half an hour away from the Gilroy and San Martin Caltrain Station by bus. San Martin is just 15 minutes away for future residents by bicycle. The estimated cost and timeline for construction have yet to be shared.
Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail
Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews
Gross! Another blatant misuse, if not illegal use of builder’s remedy.
Greenfield sprawl like this suck. More traffic, more pollution, and more open space/farmland wiped out. Is this really what YIMBYs want?
I definitely don’t think most YIMBYs want this–it’s antithetical to the YIMBY goal of higher density development within cities in lieu of car-dependent suburban sprawl. The YIMBY site appears to post all residential projects it hears about, whether a given project is one of urban infill (yay) or, like this one, suburban sprawl (boo).
Sadly Scott Wiener’s antics, whether by design or not, have emboldened bottom-feeder sprawl merchants like this. The Builder’s Remedy abuses must be curbed before the entire Coyote Valley is overrun.
Extremely unfortunate that we can not focus our development in current city limits as infill to make our cities more vibrant. Keep our beautiful rural areas from being destroyed by suburban sprawl which simply magnifies all our problems – lack of public transportation, increased energy use, ultimately climate change which can not be reversed.
100% agree with your comment.
I echo Bill’s sentiment.
This SUCKS!
It’s cheaper in the short run to build horizontally over farmland than to build infill vertically. I get it. But it’s a bad solution to the home shortage in the long run.
600+ homes stuffed into an area with roughly 30 single family homes nearby. No existing infrastructure. Everything will require a car trip. Absolutely abuse of this builders remedy to make money.
This project seems to underscore the failure of local municipalities in permitting enough housing. If there is demand for this number of houses in a rural area, there must be a chronic lack of supply.
These houses are not being built for local residents – rather for commuters to Silicon Valley.